Strength & Conditioning Certification

NSCA · CSCS · Program Implementation

CSCS program implementation, new in 2025

Program Implementation is 20% of Practical/Applied, 22 scored questions, and the newest domain on the exam. It took over testing and monitoring from the old Testing, Ongoing Monitoring, and Data Evaluation domain and added coaching athletes through a session and communicating results.

Updated Oct 27, 2026 · Not affiliated with NSCA, ACSM, BOC, CSCCa, ISSA or USAW.

  • 20%of its section
  • 22scored questions
  • 3task areas
  • 15questions on this page

Session and testing questions to go

CSCS practice questions with every answer explained, in a study app. Not affiliated with NSCA, ACSM, BOC, CSCCa, ISSA or USAW.

What the outline covers

Three task areas, in our words (handbook, pp. 42–43):

  • Coaching a session: preparing, defining roles, setting expectations
  • Motor learning in practice: internal and external cues, progressions and regressions, demonstrations
  • Watching and collecting data to give feedback, then a debrief that evaluates your own coaching
  • Choosing equipment and protocols for testing strength, power, speed and aerobic capacity, and for monitoring readiness
  • Running tests and monitoring: data collection, warm-up, rest between trials, athlete readiness
  • Judging whether a test was valid, analyzing trends with descriptive statistics
  • Sharing results with stakeholders while protecting the athlete’s privacy, then adjusting the program

Coaching the session

The new task treats the session as something you prepare, run and review. Before: roles for each staff member and expectations the athletes know. During: cues, demonstrations and progressions chosen for the athlete in front of you, and observation that produces data, not just impressions. After: a debrief in which you judge your own coaching, not only the athletes’ work (handbook, p. 42). In the old outline cues and feedback sat under Sport Psychology as motor learning; preparing, running and debriefing a whole session is new as a task.

What carried over, and what is new

Testing and readiness monitoring carry over: the old domain, Testing, Ongoing Monitoring, and Data Evaluation, already listed monitoring protocols and athlete readiness (2022 handbook, p. 38). What the current wording adds are named examples (practice loads, game loads, HRV), trend analysis with descriptive statistics, and sharing results with coaches and athletes while protecting private data.

Where this domain stops

Rehabilitation exercise during medical care is athletic training (therapeutic intervention); the return-to-performance work after it is yours. Monitoring technology and data systems in depth belong to the certifier’s sport-science credential, the CPSS, not to this exam.

15 program implementation questions

0 of 15 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A youth soccer coach with limited equipment and one assistant needs an aerobic fitness test for 24 players aged 12–14. Which test is MOST appropriate?

  1. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test needs only cones and audio, tests the whole group at once and fits soccer's intermittent demands.
  2. The 30-second Wingate test measures anaerobic power on a cycle ergometer, not aerobic fitness.
  3. A graded treadmill VO2max test needs lab equipment and tests one player at a time.
Question 2 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A novice learning the power clean fails a rep. The coach responds with 'jump harder, keep the bar close, and catch with high elbows,' and the next rep is worse. Which feedback approach is MOST appropriate?

  1. Long lists of cues after every rep overload a novice's working memory, which is what made the next rep worse.
  2. Giving no cues until the session ends leaves the athlete repeating the same fault without guidance.
  3. One short, prioritized cue per attempt targets the most important fault without overloading a novice's attention.
Question 3 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

Over two weeks of heavy training, a volleyball player's countermovement jump height falls by 12% and ground contact times in repeated hops rise, with no change in body mass. What is the MOST appropriate response?

  1. Keeping the plan ignores two converging markers of declining readiness.
  2. A clear drop in jump height plus longer contact times, with no change in body mass, points to accumulated fatigue, so the load should come down.
  3. More plyometric volume adds stress to an athlete already showing neuromuscular fatigue.
Question 4 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A strength coach reviews countermovement jump (CMJ) data to identify athletes whose decrease in performance most likely reflects a meaningful change rather than normal daily variation. Based on the data below, which athlete should be flagged?

AthleteBaseline Mean (cm)Standard Deviation (cm)Today's Score (cm)
A50.04.047.0
B55.01.252.4
C60.03.558.0
D45.02.843.5
  1. Athlete B's drop of 2.6 cm is about 2.2 standard deviations below baseline, the only change clearly beyond normal day-to-day variation.
  2. Athlete A dropped the most centimeters, but with an SD of 4.0 cm that is only about 0.75 SD, within normal variation.
  3. Athlete D's drop is about 0.5 SD, too small to separate from normal daily variation.
Question 5 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A strength and conditioning professional wants to use velocity-based training for the back squat and needs the most valid and reliable measure of mean concentric bar velocity. Which technology is MOST appropriate?

  1. A linear position transducer tethered to the bar is the field device with the best validity and reliability for mean bar velocity.
  2. Slow-motion phone video depends on manual frame-picking and camera angle, so it is less reliable for every set.
  3. A wrist-worn accelerometer tracks arm movement and estimates velocity indirectly, which adds error.
Question 6 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A soccer player's countermovement jump height falls from a baseline of 60 cm to 53 cm during a heavy training block. What is the percent change from baseline, to one decimal place?

  1. −13.2% divides the 7-cm drop by the new score of 53 instead of the baseline of 60.
  2. −7.0% treats the 7-cm drop as a percentage without dividing by the baseline.
  3. (53 − 60) ÷ 60 × 100 = −11.7%.
Question 7 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A sport scientist monitors an athlete's countermovement jump (CMJ) daily; the test's coefficient of variation (CV) is 3%. Based on the data below, on which day does CMJ FIRST fall by more than the test's typical variation?

DayCMJ height (cm)Change from baseline
Day 140.00%
Day 239.0−2.5%
Day 338.5−3.75%
Day 435.0−12.5%
Day 537.0−7.5%
  1. Day 4 shows a larger drop, but Day 3 already crossed the threshold, so Day 4 is not the first.
  2. Day 3 is the first day the drop (3.75%) exceeds the 3% coefficient of variation.
  3. Day 2's 2.5% drop is within the 3% typical variation of the test.
Question 8 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

Two staff members must assess lower-body strength in 40 novice high school athletes during one preseason session. Which test is MOST appropriate?

  1. True 1RM testing on 40 novices with two staff is slow and risky for athletes with unproven technique.
  2. A push-up test measures upper-body muscular endurance, not lower-body strength.
  3. A 5RM test is safer for novices and quicker to run with little staff, and the result can be converted to an estimated 1RM.
Question 9 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

At baseline, athletes began the 20-m sprint test 30 cm behind the first timing gate. At retest, the tester had them start directly on the gate line. What effect is MOST likely?

  1. Starting on the line removes the flying start that made baseline times quick, so times get slower, not faster.
  2. The measured distance is the same, but the start condition changed, so the times will differ rather than show no effect.
  3. With a 30-cm run-in, athletes were already moving when they broke the first beam, so starting on the line makes retest times slower.
Question 10 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

Over one week, a rugby player's session RPE load rises 25% (450 to 563 AU per session) while GPS total distance stays the same (5,200 m per session). What is the MOST appropriate next step?

  1. A rise in perceived load at the same distance points to harder running or a tired athlete, so intensity data and wellness should be checked.
  2. The GPS distance is consistent, so nothing suggests the units are faulty.
  3. A 25% rise in internal load at an unchanged external load is too large to dismiss as normal variation.
Question 11 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A 60-minute testing session includes a 1RM back squat, a vertical jump, a 300-yd shuttle, and body composition (skinfolds). Which order is MOST appropriate?

  1. Body composition goes first while the athlete is rested and dry, the jump comes before maximal strength, and the exhausting shuttle comes last.
  2. Skinfolds after the squat and before the shuttle come after fatigue and sweat that can distort measurements.
  3. Running the 300-yd shuttle second leaves the athlete exhausted for the 1RM squat.
Question 12 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A strength and conditioning professional tests a large collegiate team's vertical jump. Scores are normally distributed with a mean of 24 in (61 cm) and a standard deviation of 2 in (5 cm). One athlete jumps 26 in (66 cm). At approximately which percentile does this athlete rank?

  1. About 68% of scores fall within ±1 SD of the mean, which describes a range, not a percentile.
  2. The 98th percentile corresponds to about z = +2, a 28-in jump.
  3. 26 in is one SD above the mean, and about 84% of a normal distribution falls below z = +1.
Question 13 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A sprinter's 10-m time has been 0.08 s slower than baseline on two tests a week apart, and the staff decide to cut his sprint volume for 10 days. Which message to the athlete is MOST appropriate?

  1. It states plainly what changed, what the staff will do and when he will be retested, so he understands and can buy in.
  2. Calling a repeated slowdown 'basically normal' misrepresents the data the plan is based on.
  3. Jargon about kinetics and protocols tells the athlete little he can act on and gives no timeline for the next check.
Question 14 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A high school basketball coach measures vertical jump with a jump-and-reach device (Vertec). How is the athlete's jump height determined?

  1. The device's base vane height is the same for everyone and has nothing to do with the athlete's own reach.
  2. Jump height is the highest vane touched minus the athlete's standing reach with the arm fully extended.
  3. Subtracting body height ignores arm length and greatly overstates the jump.
Question 15 of 15 · Program Implementation · 20%

A collegiate team is starting daily HRV monitoring. When should athletes take their daily reading to MOST improve day-to-day comparability?

  1. Evening readings are affected by the day's activity, meals and stress, which makes them hard to compare.
  2. A reading on waking, before food, caffeine or training, removes most acute influences, so day-to-day changes reflect recovery.
  3. A reading right after training mostly shows the acute effects of that session.

Answer every question to see your score

How it connects

Statistics and the reliability of tests are taught in Exercise Sciences; test results feed the needs analysis in Program Design; cueing and practice structure draw on Sport Psychology.

The other six domains

Program implementation, quick answers

What replaced the testing domain on the CSCS?

Program Implementation, in the outline in force since July 2025. It keeps testing and monitoring and adds coaching sessions and communicating results.

Is HRV on the CSCS exam?

The outline names HRV as an example of readiness monitoring, next to practice and game loads.